31 December 2016

Confessions of a Waitress: Part 2 of 3


(Josie Sayz: Here is part two of three of my ‘Confession of a Waitress’ list. As before, these may seem ridiculous to some, but they happen every single day. If you missed ‘Confessions of a Waitress: Part 1 of 3’ you can find it here: https://josiesayz.blogspot.co.uk/2016/12/confessions-of-waitress-part-1-of-3.html. As with 'Part 1', the restaurant's name has been changed to ‘Fin Finish’.)

Ignoring all members of staff when entering the restaurant and sitting yourself down.
No one will know that you are there. If the restaurant is incredibly busy, it is often difficult for waiters/waitresses to remember which table we have served and which table we have not. Also, members of staff are often made to take orders from tables in sections of the restaurant that they are not serving in, in order to help our struggling staff members. With various staff members coming and going from a section there is one golden rule that we have to follow to make sure that everyone is served. When a member of staff seats a customer to the table, they give you the menu. When a member of staff serves you, they must take away the menu, so other staff members know that you have been served. If you ignore all staff members and sit yourself down, you will not have a menu and it is highly likely (especially on busy days) that no one will serve you, because as far as they are aware, you have already been served, because you do not have menus.

Ignoring all members of staff when entering the restaurant and sitting yourself down on a reserved table. Not only does this cover the entire point made above, but if someone sat down on your reserved table you would not like it, would you? You would throw a fit, wouldn’t you? Start shouting abuse at the staff, wouldn’t you? Well then don’t do it.

Ignoring all members of staff when entering the restaurant and wandering around mindlessly looking for friends/family. The staff member who stands at the door ready to greet you has already seated the entire occupants of the restaurant. They know of (and have informed the waiter/waitress in specific sections) which tables are waiting for other members to join their party. If you just ask we will have you sat at your table in couple of seconds and you will not be disrupting the rest of the restaurant by pushing past their chairs for no reason.

Moving furniture.
If you move a table, it may not seem like a big deal to you, but it is there for a reason. If you are a table of four, you do not move two tables of two together in an area that best suits you. You sit on a table of four, where one is available. If a table of four is not available, you wait. If the owner happens to check the CCTV cameras and sees you have moved a table or a chair and you are sat in my section of the restaurant, well let’s just say it is the last time I will be serving you or anyone. Moving furniture can make your waitress/waiter get sacked.

Pointing at something on the menu and ask if we serve it.
This one is just self-explanatory: It would not be on the menu if we did not serve it, would it? Why would we put an item on the menu if we did not serve it? If we had ran out of something I would have told you when I handed you the menu.

Asking if we serve cod and chips.
You have just walked into a traditional, British fish and chip restaurant, ‘Fin Finish’. Cod and chips is the first thing on the menu. It is in the largest font on the menu. There is a giant picture of it on the menu. As with the previous point, we serve it as it is on the menu.

Asking what is in a certain meal. You have already been looking over the menu for several minutes, I come over to take your order, you point to something on the menu and then ask, “What’s in that?” or “What does that consist of?” It tells you. The description is right there, next to the dish’s name. So do you know what happen when you ask this question? I will not tell you the answer; I will lean over your shoulder, point to the description and say, “There you are,” smiling to you as sweetly as I can, when really I want to hit you with your menu for wasting my time. You obviously have not read the menu yet, you are not ready to order, so in the future do not call me over to your table unless you are ready to order. I have other customers whom need my time, not just you.

Saying, “I’ve searched all over the menu and I can’t find the plaice. Where is it?” You have read the entire menu several times over and not found the plaice for a reason. We obviously do not sell plaice at this place.

Asking for, “A cheese burger without the cheese.” So you want a burger? A quarter pounder, a beef burger, a plain burger, the scotch-beef-burger-on-a-bun-with-chips if you want to read it precisely from the menu. But under no circumstance do I ever want to hear, “A cheese burger without the cheese.”

Asking if pickled onions are automatically served with fish and chips.
No, no they are not. Where have you been where pickled onions automatically came with your fish and chips without having to ask for them? That would not be very wise of a restaurant if people did not like pickled onions, we would be wasting an awful lot of food. Nothing comes with the fish and chips other than fish and chips as it states on the menu. However, just because pickled onions do no automatically appear on your plate that does not mean that you cannot order a side dish of pickled onions.

Asking for things that are not on the menu. ‘Fin Finish’ serves traditional British fish and chips, along with several chicken options and burgers. The menu has been the same since the franchise opened over three years ago. The only thing that has been added to the menu is a hotdog, nothing has been taken away. So why is it that after looking over the menu for five-or-so minutes, when taking a table’s order do I often get asked for duck and egg fried rice? We do not sell it. We have never sold it. Please read the menu before you order.

Asking me where the rest of your order is when my hands are full. I can only carry three plates at a time. In case you cannot picture how this is so, with your dominant hand, you rest the first plate on your none-dominant arm, you place second plate on your none-dominant hand and then you pick the third plate up with your dominant hand. There isn’t anywhere else one can carry another plate. If you have ordered a smaller meal and a small side, I can often squeeze one side bowl on to the edge of the plate. Now you have pictured this task, how can I possibly carry the fourth person on your table’s meal and all side of your side plates and bowls? I am not an octopus, nor am I stupid. I know that not all of you table has their food. I am present at your table. I can see. Not only that, but when I was collecting your food from the kitchen there were more plates and bowls for your table. I will bring them over in the second (and possibly third) journey.

Saying, “That’s not mine.” You ordered cod and chips and a bowl of mushy peas, as I stated in the previous point, I can only carry three plates at a time. You have your cod and chips in front of you. That is what you ordered. I will be back with your bowl of mushy peas when I bring the rest. Never, ever say to your waiter/waitress, “That’s not mine,” if your only problem is that not all of your order has arrived, because you could be left with no meal at all if your server takes the plate back into the kitchen, because you have just told them that it is not yours. Of course, if you have ordered southern fried chicken and chips and you are given cod by mistake, then yes, you can say, “That’s not mine,” and your problem will be sorted in seconds, but if that is your food and you are just waiting for your side bowl of mushy peas to arrive then do yourself a favour and not utter those words.

Asking me for a refill when I have my hands full. Whether you call me over to your table or wave your empty glass in my face as I walk past you, if I am carrying a huge stack of plates what do you expect me to do? Can you not politely wait until I return? What do you expect me to do? Do you want me to grow another arm, leave the other table’s dirty plates on your table while I go and refill your drink or would you rather me drop all of the plates on the floor, leave the smashed mess and go and refill your drink for you? Your drinks are unlimited self-service refills, so rather than wait for me to come back and watch me refill your drink at a refill station that is five paces away (when you are clearly capable of doing so) why not use the self-service drinks machine yourself or just wait until I have my hands free.

Not listening to me. Do not assume that the very first thing your waitress/waiter is going to do after you have finished your meal is to force you into having anything else or desserts. We are not trying to steal your money from you by making you purchase more than you already have – especially if you have been rude or spiteful, we would be happy for you to leave. My job is to make sure that you enjoy your meal and your service. The following conversation happens multiple times an hour every single day, is incredibly irritating and makes your waiter/waitress think that you are an incredibly rude person and will possibly severely dislike you upon your next visit:
Me: “Was everything okay with your meal?”
Customer: “No, just the bill.”
Me: “Why, what was wrong?”
Customer: “Nothing; everything was fine.”
Me: “Would you like anything else?”
Customer: “I already told you no.”

Placing the bill in front of a person on the table does not mean I assume that person is going to play the bill. When you ask for the bill, I will either place the check book in front of the person who asks for it or whoever acknowledges me when I bring it over. If you are a table of eight, how can I possibly place the bill in front of all of you? No matter where I place it, it is still going to be closer to one person. Please do not behave aggressively towards me because of this.

Lying. This could be about anyone or anything. Customers continually lie daily, whether it is to try and claim a free meal, a discount or a coupon, your persistent lying can come with a consequence. There are security cameras everywhere. If you lie and say your waiter/waitress left you sat for ages before seeing to you, it is checked on CCTV. Why? Because you could get your waiter/waitress sacked – if you complain that service is slow, it will be even slower if you get every person who waits on your table sacked for no reason, as there will be no staff left in the restaurant. Please remember that your waiter/waitress is a person too, who needs their job to pay their rent and bills, just like you. How would you like it if I showed up where you work and made up a load of lies about you to try and get free stuff and you got sacked because of it. Think twice next time before you lie. Oh and just to give you a heads up, we recognised persistent complainers and we check your complaints back against CCTV. When you complain a second or third time and then complain again when you do not receive a voucher or a free meal, it is because we have caught you lying on camera.

- Josie -

It's Over Babe



(Josie Sayz: One, single word out of place is all it takes. Never before had you ever called me, “Babe.”)

Who’s that girl you’ve been sneaking around?
Is she the reason that you left town?
It’s been a whole week and I haven’t seen you around.
It’s almost like you’ve forgot my name.
Since she came along you’ve been acting strange,
‘Cause never before had you ever called me, “Babe.”
Ain’t seen you around…
Guess it’s over now.
When she bats her eyes,
You just try to disguise
These feeling you hide,
While you’re telling me lies.
My faith in you it starts to fade.
All that’s left is the pain,
Making me feel ashamed.
You’ve been leading me on.
You’ve been playing a game.
Or was it just a new nickname?
Well, it’s over babe.
Three weeks pass, then you show up at mine.
You’re acting like everything is fine,
But your touch sends a tingle up my spine.
It’s obvious that she’s into you.
You’re acting like someone completely new.
Can’t believe I was so in love with you.
How was I so blind?
Shouldn’t have crossed my mind.
When she bats her eyes,
You just try to disguise
These feeling you hide,
While you’re telling me lies.
My faith in you it starts to fade.
All that’s left is the pain,
Making me feel ashamed.
You’ve been leading me on.
I’ll smash your picture frame.
You don’t even know my name.
Well, it’s over babe.
The words got out to town
That you’ve been sleeping around.
Did I mean nothing at all?
Your clothes are out the window,
Your bags are at the door.
I hope you never call.
When she bats her eyes,
You just try to disguise
These feeling you hide,
While you’re telling me lies.
My faith in you it starts to fade.
All that’s left is the pain,
Making me feel ashamed.
You’ve been leading me on.
Just stop playing these games.
I never want your surname.
‘Cause it’s over babe!
- Josie -

Maybe It's You



(Josie Sayz: Everyone’s heard, “It’s not you, it’s me,” the miserable words to the heartbreak dumpee. But what if the one who felt this inside, for nights at a time had cried and cried. It was not their heart that had been rearranged, but it was you, since meeting, who had changed.)

Baby, I’ve been crying all night.
Too scared to talk, don’t wanna start a fight.
I can still feel your hand brush against mine,
But how I feel now is where I draw the line.
The photos of us lay torn on the floor,
‘Cause I don’t feel the same way that I did before.
It’s over.
We’re over.
Baby, it’s not you, it’s me.
Feeling so trapped, but need to be free.
It’s not you-oo.
(It’s me)
It’s not you-oo.
I’m so sorry, don’t want it to be,
But this love is just heartache to me.
It’s not you-oo.
(It’s me)
Maybe it’s you-oo.
Maybe.
I remember you holding me tight,
You told me you loved me all through the night,
But that is just a memory.
You’re not the same guy that you used to be.
It breaks my heart to push you away,           
But I need to be honest, can’t lead you astray.
I’m sorry.
So sorry.
Baby, it’s not you, it’s me.
Feeling so trapped, but need to be free.
It’s not you-oo.
(It’s me)
It’s not you-oo.
I’m so sorry, don’t want it to be,
But this love is just heartache to me.
It’s not you-oo.
(It’s me)
Maybe it’s you-oo.
Maybe.
Maybe it’s not you, it’s me.
But this feeling’s just heartache to me.
It’s not you-oo.
(It’s me)
It’s not you-oo.
And every second that you cross my mind,
I feel like I’ve been so blind.
It’s not you-oo.
(It’s me)
Maybe it’s you-oo.
Maybe it's you-oo.
Maybe it’s you.
- Josie -

17 December 2016

My BBC’s 'Sherlock' Moriarty Theory


(Josie Sayz: This is my attempt at analysing the current theory that every seems to be talking about: Is Professor Moriarty (from the ‘BBC’s ‘Sherlock’ series) alive? I am in no way a ‘Sherlock’ fanatic, nor am I a huge fan. I do not know everything and I am not trying to come across as though I do. This is just a little bit of fun that I came up with whilst re-watching the ‘Sherlock’ episodes before the new series starts in the New Year.)

My BBC’s 'Sherlock' Moriarty Theory
Is he staying alive?

If you have been following ‘BBC’s series ‘Sherlock’ then you are already probably aware of (and anticipating) the new series in January and more-so the ongoing question: Is Professor Jim Moriarty dead? For those of you who have not watched the third episode of the second season (‘The Reichenbach Fall’) and the third episode of season three ('His Last Vow'), this post contains spoilers.

I am going to take a brief look into some of the theories that are out there. I am open to as many theories as possible, so if you have one that I have not looked into, please, do share it.

1) People love a good villain. I love a good villain. Professor Moriarty is a good villain; he’s very good. If Sherlock can fake his death, why can’t Moriarty? It’s true; Moriarty does appear to have the upper hand over Sherlock – or at least he’s got more experience running the underworld. If Sherlock is, “On the side of the angels,” Moriarty has grimmer, darker, more frequent visits with faking deaths – he has probably accomplished it hundreds, if not thousands, of times amongst his many clients during his line of work. If anyone knows how to fake a suicide, it would be Moriarty.

2) Richard Brook is real. When you see actor Andrew Scott playing Moriarty, all of the characters actions are left handed (his phone usage is mostly with his left hand, when visiting Sherlock at 221b Baker Street he purposely twists his teacup around to lift it with his left hand, he carves ‘IOU’ into an apple with his left hand, he taps out binary code with his left hand and he shoots himself with a gun in his left hand). However when Andrew Scott plays Richard Brook, it appears that his few seen actions are right handed (he holds up his right hand in surrender, points with his right hand and pushes himself up the banister with his right hand). The most obvious thing to point out here is that the actor is left handed.
          Another interesting thing, from the point-of-view of a writer is that through writing books, TV shows and films, the villain is often depicted as being left handed. The reasoning behind this dates back centuries, to when people who were left handed were believed to be evil, often tortured for their devil-like behaviour. There is a psychology theory that people who are depicted as being left handed will appear evil, or in some ways villainous, towards audiences. This isn’t just an archaic way of viewing things. When ‘Nintendo’ created a new character for their popular game series ‘Super Mario’ (in 2007) during their advertising campaign the new addition, Princess Rosalina, had her character’s image mirrored because she was left handed. All posters and video images of the new princess portrayed her as a right handed character, in fears that the public might identify her as the bad guy, when she was not.
          There are two characters that look exactly alike. Moriarty is evil and left handed, but his double, Richard Brook, is right handed. Maybe they are twins. James Moriarty does not have to be Richard Brook’s twin’s real name and Richard Brook might not necessarily be good. However, in order to easily interpret the identical-looking people as two separate individuals, the one that we know to be evil (Moriarty) must be depicted as being left handed, so that the audience can see that the two are in fact separate people. This means that although one of them is dead, the other is still alive and could be the real man behind Moriarty.

3) Moriarty used a real gun, but the chamber was empty. This is a good one. Moriarty already had one of his men watching nearby, waiting, ready to shoot Dr. Watson. It could be possible that one of Moriarty’s snipers fired a shot into the air at the exact moment that Moriarty pulled the trigger. Moriarty had also hid a blood pouch under the collar of his coat, so when he hit the ground, Moriarty appeared to have blown the back of his own head off.

4) Moriarty used a fake gun loaded with a knock-out spray. This theory comes from those with a good ear. At the beginning of ‘The Reichenbach Fall’, after Moriarty has broken into the security at The Tower of London a security guard tries to get him to leave. As the security guard approaches Moriarty, the villain sprays something in the man’s face, immediately knocking him unconscious. The sound that emits from the spray is similar to the sound that can be heard right before the gun shot as Moriarty falls to the ground towards the end of the episode. Many have speculated that Moriarty is simply using one of his own inventions, to temporarily pass off as dead. Similarly to the previous example, one of Moriarty’s snipers would have fired shot into the air and Moriarty would have planted a blood pouch underneath the collar of his coat.

5) Andrew Scott’s character is not the real Moriarty. Many do believe that the Moriarty we see shoot himself in the head is dead, however that does not mean that is the end of Moriarty. It is thought that the Moriarty we see is a companion or an eccentric hired by the real Moriarty, whom is still in hiding. Some people believe that this really is Richard Brook, but rather than being hired by Sherlock to play Moriarty, he was hired by Moriarty himself to play Moriarty. Sherlock did admit in court that prior to Moriarty’s ‘Tower of London’ security breach, he had only met him for approximately five minutes; therefore he did not really know him, he only knew of him.
        Going back to my left handed/right handed theory – Moriarty could have easily played up to this ‘left-handed-means-you’re-a-villain’ thought and purposely made his actor act left handed when portraying him, but act right handed when being Richard Brook to try and confuse Sherlock.

6) During Moriarty’s court case he wore a fox tie-pin. To me this is the most interesting piece of them all. Moriarty loves his fairytales – playing ‘Hansel and Gretel’, stating that, “Every fairytale needs a good, old-fashioned villain,” and he even calls newspapers fairytales. Thinking in terms of Moriarty’s fairytale referencing, why would the creators choose to have him wear a fox tie-pin during his court case or why would Moriarty, himself, choose to wear such an unusual piece? Two Grimm Brothers stories have a fox character that shares traits with Moriarty. One of the Grimm Brothers stories is ‘The Fox and the Cat’ in which the fox reveals to the cat that he knows of many tricks – which could be referring to hiding or faking death to avoid pray. In ‘The Fox and the Horse’, the fox teaches the horse how to play dead in order to get what it wants. Both of these fox fairytales appear to hint that Moriarty intends to fake his death.

(And for those of you who need me to point out: at the end of season three’s episode ‘His Last Vow’, when Moriarty appeared on every television screen his mouth did not move when he spoke and the voice was distorted. This does not class as evidence and I am not going to analyse it.)


The Conclusion: While all of these theories seem plausible one way or another, not one is without fault.

In relation to theories one, three and four, Moriarty couldn’t have faked his own death so obviously in front of Sherlock. If he thought for a second that Sherlock were to believe that he were alive, Sherlock would never have followed through with his supposed suicide to save the lives of John, Lestrade and Mrs. Hudson. The theory surrounding the blood pouch hidden underneath Moriarty’s coat collar does not appear to be possible either, as Moriarty is not wearing a high-collar coat, so hiding such a thing seems impossible.

As for the second theory, Richard Brook cannot be real. When Moriarty asks Sherlock if he started to wonder if Moriarty was real, Sherlock confirms that he knew Richard Brook was a fake person all along, because in German, “Rich Brook,” means Reichen Bach, which is the case that made Sherlock Holmes famous. Moriarty informs him that nobody, except Sherlock, gets the joke – as they all believe Richard Brook to be a real person, confirming that he is not.

The fifth theory is a little harder to disprove – that the Moriarty we see is not the real Moriarty, but an actor hired by Moriarty. For this theory, I am going to look at the binary code clue which Moriarty gives Sherlock. The binary codes which Moriarty taps out on his knee (after researching) translates to, “There is no key.” The binary code that Sherlock taps out to Moriarty is different and meaningless gobbledygook. It is quite likely that Sherlock already has translated the binary code and knows that it is meaningless. Once he realised what the code meant, he was playing dumb, pretending that the code was meaningful, playing into Moriarty’s game so that Moriarty would confess how he broke into The Tower of London, Bank of England and Pentonville Prison. Would the real Moriarty be so foolish as to entrust an actor with his knowledge of how he broke into such secure locations? Also, would the actor have known what the binary code translated to? If he did not, what would have happened if the actor got the binary code wrong? Yes, the binary code was not a real key, but it would never have translated to, “There is no key,” had it not been tapped out correctly. You may be thinking, “So what?” But to Moriarty, this binary code would have meant everything to him. It was telling Sherlock that there was no key all along. It was his secret message and it had to be played out right. It had to be perfect – perfect to a tee. It isn’t something that he could let an actor slip up on – where would his fun be then? It really wouldn’t be a key then, would it? If you want something done right, do it yourself.

Point number six, the fox tie-pin, could simply mean that Moriarty is as sly as a fox. Everyone knows that he is guilty, yet is found not-guilty because of his cunning tricks. It may have nothing to do with the Grimm Brothers’ cheating death stories at all. If anything, ‘The Fox and the Cat’ story could prove that despite Moriarty knowing many tricks, he was not able to escape death – as the fox is thought to be mauled by a pack of dogs at the end of the tale.

So what is my conclusion? Moriarty is dead. Yes, Moriarty was a brilliant villain, but at the end of the day, he was never the only villain that Sherlock Holmes faced. He was only ever in a very small handful of Doyle’s stories. In Doyle’s works, Sherlock may have faked his own death at ‘Reichenbach Falls’, but Professor Moriarty did not. Do the writers of ‘BBC’s ‘Sherlock’ want to be known as the people who just couldn’t let a good villain go, dragging out his final story? Every good writer knows when to put down the pen. Holmes faced many good villains in Doyle’s books and I dare say we will soon meet another of Sherlock’s greatest foes – and see the return of some familiar faces too… just not Moriarty.

- Josie -